Food Fraud Advisors

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Tools, Templates and Training
  • Learn about food fraud
  • Report a food crime
  • News
You are here: Home / Archives for Karen Constable

20th May 2026 by Karen Constable

When food fraud turns deadly: milk adulteration kills 6 people

In February 2026, six people died and seven more became critically ill after consuming contaminated milk in India. The milk is reported to have come from a processing facility, a “private milk chilling unit”, that was operating without the required permissions. The person who operated the unit was arrested.

The milk was contaminated with toxic ethylene glycol coolant after a leak, according to CNBCTV (India). Propylene glycol, not ethylene glycol, is food-safe and typically used for dairy operations, whereas ethylene glycol is used for non-food industrial applications and in automotive antifreeze.

Propylene glycol is food-safe and typically used for dairy operations, whereas ethylene glycol is used for non-food industrial applications and in automotive antifreeze.

Victims reported tasting an unusual flavour in the milk before they began to experience symptoms of acute poisoning. One media outlet reported the deaths were caused by acute renal failure.

If the allegations published by CNBCTV prove correct (investigations were ongoing at the time of this report), this is a case where a person who perpetrated food fraud – by falsely implying their milk was from a properly licensed operation – has caused multiple deaths.

The milk is reported to have come from a processing facility that was operating without the required permissions. Image: Anita Jankovic/Unsplash.

Important things to know

In India, the word ‘adulteration’ is used to refer to both accidental contamination events and deliberate addition of undeclared materials to food.

The presence of ethylene glycol in the milk appears to be the result of accidental contamination, not intentional adulteration. The unlicensed milk operator would not have wanted to sicken their customers, knowing this would bring unwanted scrutiny.

The food fraud element of this tragic situation is therefore not related to the ‘adulteration’ (contamination) of the milk, but to the deception perpetrated by the milk processor, who was operating “without the required permissions”. A properly licensed operator would not have used the highly toxic industrial coolant ethylene glycol in their refrigeration system.

Suspicious similarities…

In 2023, I wrote about the tragic contamination case(s) that caused 300 deaths of children from contaminated cough syrup in multiple countries, including Gambia, Indonesia and Uzbekistan. The deaths were attributed to the presence of ethylene glycol in the syrup, instead of the inert and safe propylene glycol, which is used as a humectant in medicated syrups.

Indonesian police investigating the cough syrup manufacturer told reporters that a chemical company had misrepresented industrial-grade ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol as pharmaceutical-grade propylene glycol.

The company name and branding of a well-known pharmaceutical supplier were used on the products, presumably without its authorisation. The perpetrators then allegedly supplied the counterfeit and highly toxic ‘Dow Chemical Thailand Pharmaceutical-grade Propylene Glycol’ to local medicine manufacturers via a distributor.

Four men from the medicine manufacturer in Indonesia were jailed, despite their legal representatives blaming the supplier of a contaminated ingredient in the medicine for the deaths, while 21 people who worked in the import, distribution and licensing of imported medicines faced court in Uzbekistan on charges including the sale of substandard medicines, tax evasion, negligence, forgery and bribery.

The Indonesian makers of the fake ‘Propylene Glycol’ and their distributors also faced criminal prosecution. The manufacturer was found at fault for the poisonings in 2024, in a civil case brought by affected families in Indonesia, and ordered to pay compensation to the families of the injured children.

Key learnings

It’s rare for food fraud events to be directly implicated in serious illnesses or deaths. However, people who are willing to cut corners and break food safety laws to make illegal profits – for example, by operating without a licence – put the safety of consumers at risk.

When illnesses and injuries do occur as a result of food fraud, it can lead to the perpetrator getting caught, and this disincentivises obviously unsafe practices by food fraud perpetrators.

In another 2020s case in India, the illnesses and subsequent traceback resulted in the arrest of the unlicensed operator.

If allegations about the nature of the poisonings in India prove correct, that is, if the milk was contaminated with toxic ethylene glycol coolant – coolant that should never be used in a food context – after a leak in an unlicensed chilling system, this will be a rare case of illegal food processing causing consumer deaths.

Main source:

CNBCTV18 India (2026). Andhra milk adulteration case: Six dead, seven people in critical condition; FSSAI seeks report. [online] Available at: https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/andhra-milk-adulteration-case-six-dead-seven-people-in-critical-condition-fssai-seeks-report-ws-l-19857629.htm

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Adulteration, Impact of Food Fraud

13th May 2026 by Karen Constable

Smart packaging to fight wine counterfeits

Wine bottle caps that contain Near Field Communication (NFC) and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips, which can be scanned by consumers, have been developed for counterfeit protection for premium wines. The caps, which are tamper-evident, prevent refill-style counterfeiting, in which fraudsters refill empty genuine bottles of premium wines with cheaper fakes and sell them for tens of thousands of dollars.

Consumers can use their smart phone to scan the cap to verify authenticity and provenance, and to confirm the bottle hasn’t been opened or altered.

 

Source:

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/drink/aussie-fights-back-against-fakes-ripping-70bn-from-wine-industry/news-story/7173f047daa93cc526ea6cfe1f78ab04

This article was originally published at The Rotten Apple – a weekly newsletter for food professionals

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Food Fraud

6th May 2026 by Karen Constable

Genuine article test: fake chocolate brand

A brand owner whose Dubai-style chocolates were faked by fraudsters has published pictures of real and counterfeit packages for consumers, so they can distinguish between real and counterfeit versions of their popular confectionery.

The counterfeit version failed to carry the correct allergen warnings about the presence of nuts.

Real and fake chocolate packaging sits side by side.
The brand owner published images with red highlights showing the differences between their packs and the counterfeits. Photo: Le Damas, via The National

The counterfeits were one of three brands of Dubai-style chocolate that were recalled in the United Kingdom in August due to the presence of undeclared peanuts, almonds, cashews, and walnuts.

At the time of the recall, the brand owner told news outlets that the affected products had not been manufactured by them or with their authorisation, saying the allergen-containing bars were counterfeits, made to mimic their products. Retailers had received the products from a mysterious trading company that was uncontactable at the time of the recall.

The company, Le Damas, told The National “We are aware of reports of potential counterfeit products being investigated by the UK Food Standards Agency and are co-operating fully with the authorities,” and said it takes “the quality, safety and authenticity of our chocolates very seriously”, and that its products are made “under strict quality controls and comply with international food safety standards”.

Read more on the suspected counterfeiting in the Dubai chocolate article in Issue 204 of The Rotten Apple.

This article was originally published at The Rotten Apple – a weekly newsletter for food professionals

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Food Fraud

29th April 2026 by Karen Constable

This is Food Fraud

Food fraud in pictures

We’ve come a long way with food fraud awareness since I started working on the subject in 2015. More and more food industry people now recognise that food fraud is a genuine threat to the safety and integrity of our food supply.

But few of us have actually seen food fraud up close. Part of the problem, of course, is that food fraud, by its very nature, is hard to spot.

This week, I’m sharing my collection of favourite food fraud images, from around the globe and across the decades, starting with turmeric extract.

Turmeric extract

No alternative text description for this image
Fig. 1. Two samples of turmeric extract side by side. The sample on the right contains about 25% curcuminoids. The sample on the left has been diluted with cornstarch and contains about 10% curcuminoids. Image: Blake Ebersole via LinkedIn.

 

Figure 1 shows a simulated “fraud” which demonstrates dilution-type fraud in turmeric extract. The sample on the right contains about 25% curcuminoids. The sample on the left has been diluted with cornstarch and contains about 10% curcuminoids.

Dilution fraud occurs when a food is diluted with material that costs less than the food to increase profits. Examples include fruit juice, milk or wine adulterated with water and sawdust added to tea powder.

Common fillers for botanical extracts are maltodextrin, starches and other materials with a cellulose base, such as carboxymethylcellulose.

Fillers and flow agents are added legitimately to botanical extracts like turmeric extract to achieve a flowable powder. However, some suppliers add more filler than needed, and this allows them to sell the same quantity of the pure extract for a higher price.

There are no legal definitions for botanical extract purity in many jurisdictions, so the amount of filler or flow agent is not regulated. If the concentration of filler or flow agent is not specified and checked by purchasers upon receipt, then the supplier may be tempted to add too much.

Purchasers of botanical extracts use visual checks, HPTLC and colour specifications as an ‘early warning signal’ when receiving material. Extracts that have a lighter colour than expected warrant further investigation, although it’s worth noting that turmeric is also vulnerable to adulteration with colourants such as metanil yellow and lead chromate.

Source: Turmeric Extract | Blake Ebersole

Saffron

diagram, engineering drawing
Fig. 2. Samples of saffron purchased from retail stores in the Netherlands, and exposed to water. One sample appears genuine, the other three indicate fraud. Image: Devi M Krishna via LinkedIn

 

Figure 2 shows a simple authenticity indicator test for saffron (Crocus sativus L.), using water. The test provides a visual indication of potential adulteration or substitution and can be used to decide which samples require further investigation.

When water is added, real saffron releases a dark golden colour over a period of a few seconds while maintaining intact stigmas. Suspicious samples release significant quantities of colour in less than 1 second, lose their structure and show evidence of non-stigma materials.

In this test, conducted by students in a food fraud course at Wageningen University on samples purchased from local stores, three of the four samples appeared inauthentic, including the most expensive samples.

Sample 3 (blue circle) was confirmed to be safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), which is substituted for, or used to adulterate, saffron, due to its similar appearance. The photographer did not share which was the genuine sample.

No alternative text description for this image
Fig. 3. Saffron flower (Crocus sativus L.) showing the stigma. Image credit: Lorenzo Lamonica.

 

Source: Saffron Test | Devi M Krishna

Paprika

Paprika powders containing added colourants.
Fig. 4. Paprika powders containing added colourants Sudan 1 & IV (left) and annato (right). Image: Tarantelli, Sheriden (2016)

 

Figure 4 shows adulteration-type fraud in two paprika products imported to the United States. The sample on the left contained very high levels of the oil-soluble dyes Sudan I and Sudan IV. The sample on the right contained the natural colour annatto (E160b).

These samples were tested by the New York State Food Lab in 2014.

Adulteration-type fraud is when something is added to food to increase its apparent value without being declared to the purchaser. Adulterants can be unsafe for consumers and often conceal quality defects. Examples include textile dyes added to spices to make them appear fresh and flavoursome, and melamine powder added to milk to boost its apparent protein content.

Sudan dyes are textile dyes which are carcinogenic and not approved for use in food. In 2024, there were 8 notifications for Sudan dyes in foods imported to the European Union. The foods included curry powder, chilli powder, palm oil, sumac powder and cheddar cheese powder.

Adulteration with unapproved dyes sometimes accompanies another type of food fraud in paprika: dilution or substitution with ‘spent paprika’.

Spent paprika is a dull fibrous material left over after paprika oleoresin – the coloured and flavoured part of paprika spice – has been extracted from the fruit (Capsicum annuum L). Paprika oleoresin has a high value and is used legally as a natural colouring agent in cheese, juices, sweets and sauces.

When spent paprika is added to whole paprika, or used in place of whole paprika, the resulting mix has a dull colour. Fraudsters then add illegal colourants such as Sudan dyes to the mixture to make it appear genuine.

diagram
Fig 5. Food laboratory Bia Analytical shared this image in a post about spent paprika, saying spent paprika is often coloured with harmful and illegal dyes like Sudan I, II, III, IV or Para Red. Image: Bia Analytical, via LinkedIn

 

Sources:

Tarantelli T., Sheriden R. (2016) Toxic Industrial Colorants found in Imported Foods. Available online at: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/industrial-dye-presentation-12-11-2015/60160214

Bia Analytical (2025) Why is Spent Paprika Not Paprika. LinkedIn. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bia-analytical_adulterate-foodfraud-foodadulteration-activity-7313487808575250433-clM7/

Oregano

Dried oregano leaves are pictured next to dried cistus, olive and myrtle leaves, showing the similarities between the products.
Fig 6. Dried oregano leaves look a lot like other dried leaves. Image: Elliott, C. (2016) Addressing complex and critical food integrity issues using the latest analytical technologies [webinar]

Figure 6 shows the similarities between dried oregano and other leaves used to dilute it.

Oregano is the herb most often affected by food fraud, and there have been several high-profile cases of consumer groups revealing food fraud in oregano, including in the United Kingdom in 2015, Australia in 2016 and the United States in 2017.

In the Australian tests, fewer than half of the 12 samples purchased from retail outlets were pure oregano. The others contained between 10 and 90 percent leaves from other plants, including olive leaves and sumac leaves. Tests in the United Kingdom and the United States of America showed adulteration in around one-third of samples.

Have things improved with oregano in the decade since?

Unfortunately, they have not. In 2020, oregano imported to Europe from Turkiye was found to contain olive leaves. Further testing revealed one-quarter of samples were affected. Two of the samples contained no oregano at all.

In 2021, the European Commission tested 1,885 samples of spices and herbs and rated oregano the worst performer for food fraud, with 48 percent of approximately 300 oregano samples affected by adulteration, mostly with olive leaves.

And in 2024, the United Kingdom’s Food Standards Agency found 13 percent of 30 samples of oregano to contain leaves other than oregano, mostly olive leaves, at levels of up to 25 percent.

Comment

Food fraud affects many types of food and drink, but I only had images of herbs, spices and botanicals in my collection. That’s not a coincidence. Herbs, spices and botanicals are some of the worst-affected foods for food fraud.

I would have loved to have shown you photographs of food fraud in other commonly affected commodities such as seafood, honey, olive oil and dairy foods, but unfortunately, fraud-affected versions of these foods look almost identical to the real thing, and so photographs are both rare and unhelpful.

Side by side images of adulterated milk and pure milk. The two images look identical.
Fig. 7 Food fraud is usually impossible to see. Image by Ivan Pergasi on Unsplash used for illustration purposes only.

 

Read more: 🍏Saffron Fraud | Issue 31 | The Rotten Apple🍏

This article was originally published at The Rotten Apple – a weekly newsletter for food professionals.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Adulteration, Food Fraud

22nd April 2026 by Karen Constable

Fraud rates of 33% in seafood (USA)

A survey of imported frozen shrimp, squid and tilapia products found 36% (n = 28) were affected by short-weighting, which is when the package contains less weight than declared and, for frozen seafood, when the product or package contains too much water glaze or ice (“overstating the net weight of frozen seafood by including the weight of glazing (ice) is not permitted”).

Close-up of a pile of frozen shrimp.
The frozen seafood products were affected by short-weighting. Image: IrinaKur/BigStock.

 

The survey was conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during 2022-2024. The sampling included both targeted and general surveillance samples of both raw and cooked products, covering 12 businesses from 4 countries. The samples were collected during import, prior to release into U.S. commerce. Each sample consisted of 48 units from the same production lot.

Most of the samples (25 of 28) were shrimp, with 2 squid and 1 tilapia sample included. Both squid samples were found to violate short-weight rules (100%, n = 2). Eight shrimp samples were violative (32%, n = 25). The tilapia sample was compliant – United States 02/09/2025.

Source: https://www.fda.gov/food/economically-motivated-adulteration-food-fraud/sample-collection-and-analysis-imported-frozen-seafood-economically-motivated-adulteration-year-2022

This article was originally published at The Rotten Apple – a weekly newsletter for food professionals

 

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Food Fraud

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 7
  • Next Page »

MORE FROM FOOD FRAUD ADVISORS

Smart packaging to fight wine counterfeits

Wine bottle caps that contain Near Field Communication (NFC) and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips, which can … [Read More...]

Red highlighting shows the difference between the real and fake chocolate packaging.

Genuine article test: fake chocolate brand

A brand owner whose Dubai-style chocolates were faked by fraudsters has published pictures of real and counterfeit … [Read More...]

Two packets of paprika powders that have been adulterated with dye and annatto.

This is Food Fraud

Food fraud in pictures We’ve come a long way with food fraud awareness since I started working on the subject in 2015. … [Read More...]

Close-up of a pile of frozen shrimp.

Fraud rates of 33% in seafood (USA)

A survey of imported frozen shrimp, squid and tilapia products found 36% (n = 28) were affected by short-weighting, … [Read More...]

A group of honey bees on beeswax.

Undercover honey investigators

I previously wrote about how my daughter, who loves honey and eats a lot of it here in Australia, complained that all … [Read More...]

follow

  • View foodfraudadvice’s profile on Facebook
  • View karenconstable4’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn

© Copyright 2015 - 2026 Food Fraud Advisors · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Return and Refund Policy