Food Fraud Advisors

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Tools, Templates and Training
  • Learn about food fraud
  • Report a food crime
  • News
You are here: Home / Archives for foodfraudadvisors

29th December 2016 by foodfraudadvisors

Help with supplier questionnaires

Use the information on this page to help answer questions in the Supplier Questionnaire for Food Fraud Advisors’ Vulnerability Assessment Tool:

Trading properties

Raw materials traded on specific properties are those for which the price paid for this raw material is based upon the content of water, dairy fat, nitrogen (protein), cocoa solids or some other key component. Answer ‘yes’ here if

  • the price your business pays is dependent on a specific property of this raw material or
  • if any of your suppliers’ suppliers price this material according to a specific property, even if your business pays a flat rate.

If you are unsure, speak to your purchasing officer.

Direct Sourcing

Answer ‘yes’ in the Supplier Questionnaire if this material or ingredient is manufactured, produced, grown or slaughtered by the business you work for.  For fish and seafood, answer ‘yes’ if your business is the first on-shore processing facility.  Answer ‘no’ if the material is purchased from a distributor or importer, trader, broker, wholesaler or retailer.

Complexity of supply chain

Do you consider the supply chain of this material to be complex and/or long?  An example of a short supply chain is wheat flour purchased directly from a flour mill that processes locally grown wheat.  A complex supply chain is one that involves many different businesses handling, processing, storing and transporting a product and its component parts.   Most imported materials have a long and complex supply chain.

Ease of access to material

Is the supply chain of a type that allows multiple points of entry for fraudulent material?  Entry points for fraudulent materials are points in the supply chain at which a motivated person could adulterate or dilute the material or substitute an inauthentic material in its place.  These points are most likely to be places where the material is blended, mixed, ground or where it is stored or transported in a manner that would allow a motivated person to easily gain access to the material.

Price

If the purchase price is more than USD20 per kg or USD20,000 per metric tonne or EUR18 per kg or 18,000 per metric tonne answer ‘yes very expensive’

If the purchase price is less than EUR600 or USD650 per metric tonne, answer ‘no’.

Size of market

Does the international market for this material have a large monetary value?  Materials that have markets with large monetary values are those that are traded in very large quantities across many countries or materials that are very expensive.  Tea, coffee, cocoa, sugar all have markets with a large monetary value.

Form of Ingredient

Answer ‘yes’ in the Supplier Questionnaire if this material or ingredient is sold to your customer in individual pieces which can be visually identified as such.  Examples include chickpeas, whole peppers, chicken wings, bananas, frozen berries, rolled oats, coffee beans, whole cloves.  If this material is sold as a powder, liquid, mince, paste, pre-mix, slurry or blend then answer ‘no’.

Special criteria

Answer ‘yes’ here if there are special criteria for this raw material or ingredient such as halal, organic, non-GMO, grass-fed, free-range or if there is a specific country of origin or grade of produce required for this material.

Availability of adulterants or substitutes

An example of a material that has easily available adulterants is honey, which can be adulterated with water, sugar syrups, invert syrups, all of which are easy to obtain.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Vulnerability Assessment Tools

29th December 2016 by foodfraudadvisors

Supplier questionnaire: Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

What is my customer going to do with the information I provide?

The information that you provide about each ingredient or material will be used by your customer to complete a vulnerability assessment for each of the materials they purchase.  Vulnerability assessments for food fraud are performed to meet the requirements of food safety management systems and to help businesses manage financial risks from food fraud.  Your customer will put the your answers into Food Fraud Advisors’ Vulnerability Assessment Tool (BRC Method), which is a quick and easy way to calculate risks and produce auditor-friendly reports.

Why are some of the questions repeated?

The questions are based on recommendations provided by the British Retail Consortium in their document Understanding Vulnerability Assessment (2015) which requires some elements to be repeated.

May I share the Supplier Questionnaire with other businesses?

If your business has purchased a copy of the Vulnerability Assessment Tool, then you may send the Supplier Questionnaire to any business that supplies you with ingredients or materials.   If you are a supplier, then you may not share the questionnaire with other businesses or take it with you when you change jobs: the business that provided you with the questionnaire (your customer) owns the licence for the questionnaire. For complete terms and conditions click here.

Why are some of the questions ‘greyed-out’?

Questions 20 – 23 and 26 are greyed-out because they cannot be properly answered by a supplier. The answers to these questions relate only to the business that is performing the vulnerability assessment (the customer).  This is because the vulnerability is related to that business’ ability to detect fraud, not their suppliers’ ability to detect it.   Customers: if you need to know about your supplier’s ability to detect food fraud in their products, you should ask them to provide you with a full vulnerability assessment that they have complete themselves.  They will need to purchase their own copy of the Vulnerability Assessment Tool, the licence rules do not permit you to share it with your suppliers.  Suppliers are eligible for a 40% discount.  Contact us to request a discount code for your suppliers to use when they purchase the tool.

Is there a telephone number I can call for help and support with the questionnaire?

Please email support@foodfraudadvisors.com with your query, including your preferred contact details and geographical location (for time zone purposes). We will contact you by telephone or Skype or email an answer to you.

Something is not working properly, what should I do? 

If there is an error in the spreadsheet please contact us. We want the Vulnerability Assessment Tool and Supplier Questionnaire to be the best they can and value your feedback.

My security settings will not allow me to run macros, is this a problem?

If you wish to use the Supplier Questionnaire you will need to enable macros.

My supplier(s) only have Microsoft Excel 1997 – 2003, will this be a problem?

If your supplier is using Excel 1997 – 2009 (file extension .xls) or Excel for Mac 2000 – 2008 they will not be able to use the questionnaire.  You can contact us to request a free copy of a supplier questionnaire that is compatible with older versions of Excel.   Alternatively, create a compatible version yourself by performing a ‘Save As’ and choosing ‘Excel 97 – 2003 Workbook’ from the drop down list.  You will be shown a compatibility checker window.  The compatibility checker lists functions that will be lost if you proceed.  These lost functions relate to the look of the spreadsheet and will not prevent the supplier from answering questions: press ‘Continue’ to accept the loss of functions and create a file that your suppliers will be able to use.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Vulnerability Assessment Tools

10th October 2016 by foodfraudadvisors

Food Fraud; news of emerging issues

The macadamia nut tree out the back of my place is flowering and is covered with long, yellow flower spikes.  In a few months it will be covered in nuts.  However, in world markets right now there is a shortage of whole macadamia nut kernels.  While stocks remain scarce, macadamia products are at increased risk of fraudulent activity.  Whole kernels are less likely than other macadamia products to be affected by fraudulent adulteration, however they are still at risk of fraudulent misrepresentation of country of origin, packing date and organic status.  Nut pieces, meals and flours are at risk of fraudulent adulteration with cheaper fillers and substitutes.

Here are some other interesting issues in food fraud or potential food fraud from the last month:

Are breadfruit products an emerging fraud risk?  Breadfruit is a starchy tropical fruit that grows on large trees in the Pacific Islands and the Caribbean. Breadfruit flour is said to have huge potential as a gluten-free product and breadfruit could become the next ‘superfood’, but right now demand outstrips supply and new trees take 3 to 5 years to bear fruit.  If the marketing gurus succeed in making breadfruit the next big thing, it will attract a premium price in North America and Europe and gluten-free breadfruit flour could become an attractive target for fraud.  I will be watching this product closely to see how the situation develops.

breadfruit
Is breadfruit destined to be the next ‘superfood’?

Hairy crabs, a delicacy in parts of China, are in season now, with crabs from particular lakes being very highly prized and even more expensive than their counterparts from other lakes.  A crab-marketing group representing hunters from Yangcheng lake designed an anti-counterfeiting system based on bar-code technology for Yangcheng crabs.  Unfortunately, they discovered that sellers of crabs from other lakes were forging the anti-fraud bar-codes.   I predict this type of fraud to increase over the next few years as consumers come to expect and trust anti-counterfeit measures applied to expensive consumer items.

For more on these topics plus expert analysis of the food fraud risk profiles of hundreds of other food materials check out our food fraud risk information database.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Food Fraud, Horizon Scanning

18th September 2016 by foodfraudadvisors

Supplements, the last frontier?

The supplement industry received a wakeup call last year, particularly in the USA, after the New York attorney general commenced legal proceedings against 13 supplements manufacturers alleging that the supplements did not contain exactly what they should have contained.  The sampling and test methodology used to support the prosecution has been widely criticised, and the industry considers the results to be questionable at best.  Nevertheless, the issue of authenticity and adulteration has received extra attention among producers and users of supplements since then.

Some examples of recent supplement frauds have involved grape seed extract adulterated with peanut skins.  Ironically, grape seed extract has also been found to be an adulterant itself, with some cranberry products adulterated.  Within the supplements investigated by the New York attorney general, valerian was found to contain garlic and wild carrot, echinacea was found to contain rice and buttercup DNA while St Johns wort was alleged to contain DNA from a species of ornamental house plant.

What’s being done?  Well you won’t read about it in the press but there’s no question that large retailers, including those that were targeted by the New York attorney general, such as Walmart, Target, GNC and Walgreens, have reviewed and tightened up their purchasing contracts; supplement testing methodology has been reviewed and reputable supplement manufacturers are testing more of their ingredients more often.  And that’s great news for consumers.

 

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Adulteration, Authenticity, Food Fraud, Prevention and Mitigation, Regulatory

14th September 2016 by foodfraudadvisors

Food Fraud Alerts – top issues this month

Highlights from this month’s Food Fraud Report

Cheese buyback

In the USA, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) is buying $20m worth of cheese in an attempt to improve prices.  The cheese will be given to food banks and pantries. read more

Cheese wheels on the shelves in diary production factory

Champagne doom

Champagne makers have warned of a looming shortage due to bad weather during the growing season, the worst in 60 years.  read more

Dairy prices turn a corner

Falling production and growing demand is said to be responsible for a  sudden sharp upturn (12.7%) in global dairy prices.  read more

Lead found in turmeric

Routine sampling by New York State (USA) food inspectors found high levels of lead in retail turmeric, leading to a recall of multiple brands in the USA.  read more

Spices and herbs in metal bowls and wooden spoons. Food and cuisine ingredients
Spices have long been susceptible to fraudulent adulteration

 

Allergenic adulteration of cumin

There has been a recall of cumin due to the presence of undeclared peanuts.  read more

Wheat markets in flux

Global wheat production volumes have smashed records for the fifth year in a row.  read more

 

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Food Fraud, Horizon Scanning

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 22
  • Next Page »

MORE FROM FOOD FRAUD ADVISORS

food vulnerability assessment

Food Safety Standards Compared (2025)

  There are many different food safety management system standards (FSMS), and they all have different … [Read More...]

Olive Oil Fraud Update – Is the Crisis Over?

When it comes to fraud-vulnerable foods, olive oil is a rockstar. When Food Fraud Advisors began in 2015, olive oil … [Read More...]

What is a food fraud team? (and what to do if you can’t get one)

A food fraud prevention team is a group of employees in a food business that is responsible for creating, implementing … [Read More...]

Food Fraud Databases Compared

Updated 22 January 2026 A food fraud database is a collection of information about food fraud incidents and food … [Read More...]

What to do About Food Fraud (USA)

I was talking to a new client the other day.  They are based in the United States and had discovered their competitors' … [Read More...]

follow

  • View foodfraudadvice’s profile on Facebook
  • View karenconstable4’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn

© Copyright 2015 - 2026 Food Fraud Advisors · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Return and Refund Policy